Difference between revisions of "Resource:E3a1be4e-2ff9-4b7f-b44c-abd409fe225a"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=“I am really sorry:” Peer reviewer stole text for own paper
 
|Title=“I am really sorry:” Peer reviewer stole text for own paper
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=This case is about Yi-Chou Tsai, a chemist at National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan. In 2009 he and a colleague published a paper. In that paper, some paragraphs were copies from a paper he was asked to review. He states that his colleague copies those paragraphs.
|Important Because=.
+
 
 +
 
 +
This is a factual case.
 +
|Important Because=One can also be indirectly involved in scientific fraud and plagiarism.  
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Website Blog (Retractionwatch)
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 15: Line 21:
 
|Has Location=Taiwan
 
|Has Location=Taiwan
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Peer review ethics violation
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Peer review ethics violation; Journal Retractions
 
|Related To Research Area=Chemical sciences
 
|Related To Research Area=Chemical sciences
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 10:13, 18 May 2020

Cases

“I am really sorry:” Peer reviewer stole text for own paper

What is this about?

This case is about Yi-Chou Tsai, a chemist at National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan. In 2009 he and a colleague published a paper. In that paper, some paragraphs were copies from a paper he was asked to review. He states that his colleague copies those paragraphs.


This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

One can also be indirectly involved in scientific fraud and plagiarism.


Website Blog (Retractionwatch)

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Virtues & Values
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6