Difference between revisions of "Resource:E79b824c-1756-40b9-a0d6-80045febf3b8"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Baltimore case--in brief | |Title=Baltimore case--in brief | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=Three months after a widely leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) within the National Institutes of Health accused Tufts immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari of fabricating data in a 1986 Cell paper she had co-authored with Nobel laureate David Baltimore, the controversy has become, if anything, more intense. An unusual series of published statements in Nature from the principals in the case has catalyzed a bitter debate within the biomedical community. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains results of fabricated data, all authors will be kept responsible. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
|Involves=Imanishi-Kari | |Involves=Imanishi-Kari | ||
|Has Timepoint=1986 - 1991 | |Has Timepoint=1986 - 1991 | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification | ||
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 29 April 2020
ResourcesCases
Baltimore case--in brief
What is this about?
Three months after a widely leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) within the National Institutes of Health accused Tufts immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari of fabricating data in a 1986 Cell paper she had co-authored with Nobel laureate David Baltimore, the controversy has become, if anything, more intense. An unusual series of published statements in Nature from the principals in the case has catalyzed a bitter debate within the biomedical community.
Why is this important?
When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains results of fabricated data, all authors will be kept responsible.
Journal
