Difference between revisions of "Resource:E79b824c-1756-40b9-a0d6-80045febf3b8"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Baltimore Case - In Brief | |Title=Baltimore Case - In Brief | ||
| − | |Is About=Three months after a widely leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) | + | |Is About=Three months after a widely-leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) accused an immunologist of fabricating data in a 1986 Cell article, the controversy has become more intense. A series of published statements in Nature has catalyzed a bitter debate within the biomedical community. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important Because=When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains | + | |Important Because=When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains fabricated data, all the authors are deemed to be responsible. |
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 19 June 2020
ResourcesCases
Baltimore Case - In Brief
What is this about?
Three months after a widely-leaked draft report by the Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) accused an immunologist of fabricating data in a 1986 Cell article, the controversy has become more intense. A series of published statements in Nature has catalyzed a bitter debate within the biomedical community. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
When an article is published, all authors are responsible for what is written in the paper. If the paper contains fabricated data, all the authors are deemed to be responsible.
