Difference between revisions of "Resource:F8de9607-459e-41f5-908d-de63eb375ce8"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Harvard probe kept under wraps: Researchers call for the release of findings of the Marc Hauser misconduct investigation
+
|Title=Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation at Harvard
|Is About=This case is about psychologist Marc Hauser who committed scientific misconduct and how Harvard has investigated this case.
+
|Is About=This case is about a psychologist who committed scientific misconduct and how Harvard has investigated this case. This is a factual case.
|Important Because=It is important that with cases like these, details are given about the investigation in order to gain trust.  
+
|Important Because=It is important that with cases like these, details are given about the investigation in order to gain trust.
 
 
 
 
Journal
 
 
 
Factual
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 14: Line 9:
 
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100817/full/466908a.html
 
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/2010/100817/full/466908a.html
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Marc Hauser
 
|Involves=Marc Hauser

Revision as of 16:39, 26 May 2020

Cases

Researchers Call For the Release of Findings of a Misconduct Investigation at Harvard

What is this about?

This case is about a psychologist who committed scientific misconduct and how Harvard has investigated this case. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

It is important that with cases like these, details are given about the investigation in order to gain trust.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6