Difference between revisions of "Resource:Fa27f5f7-b2cd-43b3-83df-892fc20d948b"
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science | |Title=The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science | ||
| − | |Is About=This is a factual case. | + | |Is About=This is a factual case that examines the role of moral values in the distinction of science and non-science. The article details a recent (at the time of writing) case of scientific misconduct to show the difference in moral philosophy when applied to science and when applied to non-scientific practices. The rest of the publication further elaborates on these differences and if they might be used to distinguish between science and non-science. |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because=<br /> | + | |Important Because=Although there is much legislation and debate about science, its distinction from non-science is blurred. The article concludes that science is treated specially by moral philosophy, as cases of scientific misconduct are treated differently than cases of misbehaviour in other fields. Therefore, moral philosophy may play an interesting role in distinguishing non-science from science and may have consequences for the legislation on scientific research and the handling of cases of misconduct. Accordingly, it would be interesting to examine the exact role of moral philosophy in the distinction between science and non-science. Albeit answering this question is beyond the scope of this article, it may be an important first step towards a conclusion on this subject. <br /> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:0d054575-ca21-4209-b7c5-6120fc0ed647 |
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 16 August 2021
ResourcesThe role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
What is this about?
This is a factual case that examines the role of moral values in the distinction of science and non-science. The article details a recent (at the time of writing) case of scientific misconduct to show the difference in moral philosophy when applied to science and when applied to non-scientific practices. The rest of the publication further elaborates on these differences and if they might be used to distinguish between science and non-science.
Why is this important?
Although there is much legislation and debate about science, its distinction from non-science is blurred. The article concludes that science is treated specially by moral philosophy, as cases of scientific misconduct are treated differently than cases of misbehaviour in other fields. Therefore, moral philosophy may play an interesting role in distinguishing non-science from science and may have consequences for the legislation on scientific research and the handling of cases of misconduct. Accordingly, it would be interesting to examine the exact role of moral philosophy in the distinction between science and non-science. Albeit answering this question is beyond the scope of this article, it may be an important first step towards a conclusion on this subject.
