Semantic search

From The Embassy of Good Science
 TypeWhat is this about?Why is this important?For whom is this important?Link
Academic Integrity Tutorial with QuizEducationThis online tutorial provides an overview of the importance of academic integrity. Participants will have the opportunity to learn strategies of how to identify plagiarism, conduct academic research, and properly cite citations.Research integrity issues have to be dealt with at an early stage of a researchers career. This tutorial is a useful and fun way to address this topic.Early career researchers
PhD Students
Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and HypercompetitionEducationThis study addresses perverse incentives and decreased funding as potential causes for unethical behavior. The authors conclude that academia and federal agencies should better support research and emphasize altruistic and ethical outcomes, not the output.Researchers
Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisorsCasesThis case presents four factual anonymised cases of misconduct practices occurring in PhD supervision. More specifically: a) engagement with regulatory processes (i.e., the case of deviation from the initially ethics-approved data collection procedures without informing the relevant regulatory body); b) problems of knowledge or understanding transfer (i.e., a misunderstanding between student and supervisor in relation to intellectual property); c) culturally specific issues in the PhD study (i.e., the writing of disjoined, sometimes plagiarised, paragraphs in the thesis of a student whose first language was not English); d) academic theft (i.e., a student discovered her ex-supervisor had published work containing a literature review very similar to her own).These are thought provoking examples of roles and responsibilities in the PhD student-supervisor relationship. They are real examples that can be used for reflection for supervisors and students alike, as well as for teaching purposes.PhD Students
Supervisors
Academic integrity at MIT, a handbook for studentsEducationThis handbook outlines important information you will need to know about correctly acknowledging your sources when you write a report, research paper, critical essay, or position paper. It provides guidelines for collaboration on assignments and writing code. The handbook also provides information about what constitutes violations of academic integrity and the consequences of committing such violations'"`UNIQ--ref-00000219-QINU`"'. '"`UNIQ--references-0000021A-QINU`"'All stakeholders in research
Students
Academic integrity checklistEducationThis flyer contains a wealth of small pointers for writing a paper, conducting research and working with others. You’ll find advice to help you on your way, and handy hints'"`UNIQ--ref-00000218-QINU`"'.All stakeholders in research
Students
Academic medical centers and medical research: the challenges aheadEducationThis study presents different challenges in medical research, such as the need to manage public expectations for new discoveries and maintain the public trust as well as consider the gap between research costs and funding sources. The authors examined these and other challenges and offered recommendations to medical schools and teaching hospitals on dealing with them.Researchers
Students
Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutionsEducationThis article informs on the best research record-keeping practices developed as an adjunct to a research project on research ethics. These practices provide separate standards for individual researchers, research group leaders and departments or institutions and are offered as ethical and practical guidelines for researchers.Researchers
Accuracy of Credentials and Competence in Public CommunicationsCasesCarrie Mediln is a researcher who took a teaching position without completing her doctorate. She is routinely addressed by students as "Doctor" and is often introduced as "Doctor" Medlin during academic events and public speaking opportunities. She never clarifies that she did not receive a PhD degree. The case study asks whether Medlin has a responsibility to clarify her credentials.Researchers
Early career researchers
General public
Act on the Danish Council for Research and Innovation PolicyGuidelinesThis law, that covers various aspects of research, innovation and integrity, establishes the framework for the Danish Research and Innovation Policy Council and the Danish Independent Research Foundation is are independent bodies that promote research.Academic institutions
Research institutions
Research Integrity Officers
Researchers
Policy makers
Acting with Research IntegrityInteractiveLearn about the different ways in which a researcher can act with (and without) integrity!
Administrators and Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)EducationThis is an online tutorial for administrative staff which contains modules in five instructional areas: conflict of interest, financial management, mentor-trainee responsibilities, collaborative research and data management.Research administrators have an important role in promoting research integrity and bringing solutions to problems and conflicts. For accomplishing this work, administrators need to have a set of skills and knowledge which are presented in this module.Administrators
Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of ConductGuidelinesAlthough the Dutch Code of Ocnduct for Researchers has previously undergone minor revisions, there is a need for more substantial changes in view of recent developments in international codes. This document provides an analysis if the pre-existing guideline and suggests modifications.All stakeholders in research
Age-Old ConflictsCasesThis is a fictional case on conflict of interest in biomedical research, including questions for discussion.This is a useful resource for organizing a case discussion on conflicts of interest.Researchers
PhD Students
Research integrity trainers
Industry
Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer reviewCasesThis is the factual case of an agriculture research scientist whose several papers were retracted following accusation of fake reviews.Whilst some publishers allow or encourage suggestions for reviewers, one needs to be careful at how they go about this often controversial practice.  Journals in general have a transparent policy and set of guidelines on peer-reviewing. Some publishing bodies offer comprehensive sections on peer-reviewingReserchers
Journal editors
Journal publishers
Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research DataGuidelinesBesides the German National Research Foundation (DFG), other prominent research organizations such as the Alliance of German Science Organisations have also created codes and guidelines that deal with specific topics. This document addresses the importance of good data management practices and the principles therein.Researchers
Research institutions
Research Integrity Officers
All stakeholders in research
An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.CasesThis blog post describes a case where the bachelor's thesis of a Hungarian mathematics student is plagiarised and published in Scientific Reports — a Springer Nature title.This case demonstrates that even famous journals might publish plagiarised material. It also shows that sometimes it might take years before a flawed article is retracted.Researchers
An empirical research study of the efficacy of two plagiarism-detection applicationsEducationThis article describes a study of the two most popular plagiarism-detection software platforms - Turnitin and SafeAssign and reviews current literature focusing plagiarism-detection efficacy. The study results show that Turnitin had the highest success at plagiarism detection with an 82.4 percent detection rate.Researchers
An innovation in teaching ethics to medical studentsEducationThis article presents a model of medical ethics teaching at undergraduate level. This model allows students to discuss ethical problems in small groups.Researchers
Undergraduate trainers
An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sampleScenariosThis is the hypothetical scenario about the research process which was poorly planned.Careful research planning helps to eliminate potential problems and increases the validity of the findings.All stakeholders in research
Bachelor students
Doctoral students
An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sampleCasesCase describing poorly planned research study.Doctoral students
Bachelor students
All stakeholders in research
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6