Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- inform the authorities of potential scientific misconduct by their principal investigator. On the other hand, blowing the whistle may cause them to lose their2 KB (238 words) - 17:31, 19 August 2021
- inevitably be experienced alongside benefits. That’s why it’s important to carefully assess how important the benefits are and under what cost. These dilemmas should2 KB (306 words) - 18:11, 20 October 2020
- is that, first, a wide range of defendants were named, including principal investigators, university trustees, hospital administration, and medical school2 KB (199 words) - 16:13, 19 October 2020
- practice. Moreover, the poster reminds all types of supervisors (principal investigator, research coordinator, academic advisor, mentor) to their responsibilities1 KB (112 words) - 11:45, 28 October 2020
- Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal (section For whom is this important?)scientistsDecision makersHuman rights defendersGovernmentIndustryPrincipal investigatorsResearch organisationsScientistsRegulatorsPolicy-makersResearchers2 KB (231 words) - 15:45, 10 April 2024
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 (section Why is this important?)researchersJunior researchersPhD StudentsSupervisorsPeer reviewersPrincipal investigators ORI 2004 Columbia University Honesty Accountability Fairness Authorship3 KB (348 words) - 11:49, 7 September 2020
- get the credit (ghost authors). Getting authorship credit in academia is important because it’s one of the main ways how other researchers and institutions3 KB (359 words) - 17:54, 26 March 2021
- students the guidance needed to conduct reliable research. SupervisorsPrincipal investigatorsEarly career researchersPhD StudentsPostdocs A set of guidelines2 KB (277 words) - 12:03, 28 October 2020
- advocates, and those stakeholders otherwise underrepresented in these important initiatives for Open Science. Working to support the EOSC Future project4 KB (542 words) - 18:13, 7 May 2024
- Click on one or more items below to narrow your results. For whom is this important? ;Academic institutionsAcademic staffActivistsAdministratorsAdvisors of31 KB (6,324 words) - 15:37, 14 February 2024
- researchersMaster studentsMentorsPeer reviewersPhD StudentsPostdocsPrincipal investigatorsProfessorsResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity OfficersResearch6 KB (646 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- Type What is this about? Why is this important? For whom is this important? Administration of the off-label targeted therapy in accordance to the comprehensive106 bytes (0 words) - 12:13, 26 October 2020
- 3, 160384 (2016) StudentsPhD StudentsResearch subjectsScientistsPrincipal investigatorsResearchersResearch institutionsSupervisorsPostdocsUniversitiesFundersJunior5 KB (632 words) - 14:42, 20 March 2022
- Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project (section Why is this important?)OfficersResearchersSupervisorsUniversitiesIndustryindustry stakeholdersPrincipal investigatorsFunders The aim of all eight scenarios is to allow researchers, research5 KB (466 words) - 15:21, 19 October 2021
- Research misconduct (section Why is this important?)StudentsPhD StudentsResearch subjectsScientistsEthics committee membersPrincipal investigatorsResearchershealth care professionalsacademic staffResearch institutionsPolicy6 KB (704 words) - 11:49, 27 March 2021
- Click on one or more items below to narrow your results. For whom is this important? ;Academic institutionsAcademic staffActivistsAdministratorsAdvisors of1,055 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:17, 21 December 2023