Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 0.pdf phd studentsEarly career researchersPIPeer reviewersJournal editorsJournal publishers Common practises on standards of authorship vary between scientific4 KB (465 words) - 16:47, 25 March 2021
- to PhD students. Duration (hours) 12.5 Participants 25 For whom is this important? PhD StudentsJunior researchers Method eLearning Participatory sessions7 KB (929 words) - 15:29, 6 October 2022
- Predatory publishing (section Why is this important?)studentsMaster students Lists of predatory publishers (blacklists) as well as lists of high quality open access publishers (whitelists) are of great value to researchers9 KB (1,354 words) - 17:40, 26 March 2021
- and Best Practice Guidelines for Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers Journal editors often need to make difficult decisions about allegations3 KB (278 words) - 16:46, 25 March 2021
- attributing them for their work, but also the original publishers. It is important to recognize journals that do steal the work of others as fast as possible2 KB (179 words) - 14:50, 5 August 2021
- ations-that-authors-should-provide-at-the-journal-submission-stage. When submitting an article to a journal, author’s consent for publication must be attached6 KB (807 words) - 15:19, 27 May 2021
- scholarly journals. It facilitates journal editors to become transparent about their editorial procedures, advises journal editors and publishers on potential2 KB (259 words) - 15:36, 22 October 2021
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? (section Why is this important?)discussion mainly for those involved in publishing. Journal publishersJournal editorsAcademic staffPublishers Cases Open About954 bytes (93 words) - 12:37, 28 June 2021
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings (section Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings)useful for researchers, PhD students, journal editors and publishers. ResearchersPhD StudentsJournal editorsPublishers428 bytes (30 words) - 15:29, 3 May 2021
- not have the means for subscription to expensive journals. The initiative recommends scholarly publishers to make their abstracts more visible and easily3 KB (415 words) - 09:28, 9 September 2021
- Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking” (section Why is this important?)research are important, and editors and publishers are nonetheless part of it. AuthorsReviewersEditorsJournal editorsJournal publishers Cases Open About1,006 bytes (87 words) - 12:24, 6 July 2021
- Think. Check. Submit. (section Why is this important?)Submit is an initiative that helps researchers identify trusted journals and publishers for their research. Through a range of tools and practical resources1 KB (142 words) - 20:31, 31 August 2020
- to individual researchers and their institutions but also to journal editors and publishers; although such cases have so far been less frequently encountered2 KB (183 words) - 12:30, 6 July 2021
- Plan S (section Why is this important?)plan for Plan S. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):206-7. EveryoneJournal publishersFunding institutionsPublishers The main principle of Plan S states that all research3 KB (424 words) - 15:15, 22 October 2021
- asks about the appropriate course of action in such situations. Journal publishersPublishersResearchersReviewers American Sociological Association Reliability1 KB (116 words) - 13:56, 23 April 2021
- bodies offer comprehensive sections on peer-reviewing ReserchersJournal editorsJournal publishers Christos Damalas 9/4/2020 Peer Review LS 09.05 - Agriculture1 KB (99 words) - 16:02, 21 June 2021
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS) (section Why is this important?)SSH disciplines. The platform collaborates with 120 publishers and provides services for publishers, libraries and research funders for deposit, quality6 KB (746 words) - 10:05, 19 October 2021
- AI Generated Content (section Why is this important?)interesting questions relating to authorship. AI generated content presents important questions for conceptions of integrity in research and authorship, because4 KB (529 words) - 17:20, 17 April 2024
- Self-plagiarism (section Why is this important?)work, you usually sign a contract with the journal, by which you transfer copyright rights to the publisher. That way, when you copy your own work, you3 KB (420 words) - 11:45, 27 March 2021
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review (section For whom is this important?)environmental journal were retracted following investigations on claims that the peer-review process had been compromised. EditorsJournal publishersJournal editorsPeer694 bytes (49 words) - 14:13, 21 June 2021