Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis

Resources

Cases

Protecting peer review: Correspondence chronology and ethical analysis

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

ResearchersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity Officers

Other information

Who

• Nikos K. Logothetis
• Amir Shmuel
• David Leopold

When

• 2008

Where

• Canada
• Germany
• USA

Virtues & Values

• Respect
• Reliability

Good Practices & Misconduct

• Peer Review
• Data Issues
• Data Ownership

Research Area

• SH 04.05 - Social and clinical psychology