Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Good Practices & Misconduct)aware of the complexities of using moral theories for non-philosophers, his version of the model provides a framework for an orderly discussion of ethical7 KB (856 words) - 13:19, 8 August 2021
- Authorship criteria (section Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct)to the accuracy or completeness of any part of the work are properly investigated and resolved. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations:8 KB (1,039 words) - 18:49, 25 March 2021
- Researcher 2000 United States Accountability Plagiarism Allegation of Misconduct Plagiarism Allegation672 bytes (52 words) - 14:31, 5 March 2021
- requests of (any one from a) non-member organisation, but in general it will do so in cases of severe and founded allegations of research misconduct with a8 KB (1,119 words) - 15:14, 11 December 2019
- Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct (section Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct)2021 Education Open About Education Open About Research misconduct Honesty Allegations of misconduct Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism1 KB (126 words) - 15:07, 22 October 2021
- Dishonesty 2011 Denmark Honesty Respect Plagiarism Publication Ethics Allegation of Misconduct2 KB (165 words) - 15:03, 10 August 2020
- research conduct issue and may be considering whether to make an allegation of misconduct. It is important that staff and students have the opportunity to1 KB (209 words) - 15:24, 22 October 2021
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Responsibility Transparency Adherence to Regulations Allegation of Misconduct Misconduct Investigations Research Misconduct Investigation2 KB (169 words) - 17:31, 20 October 2020
- The Flemish Council for Scientific Integrity's Guidelines on Plagiarism in Funding Applications (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Council for Research Integrity (VCW) 2017 Belgium Transparency Allegation of Misconduct Failure of Acknowledgment2 KB (163 words) - 12:03, 18 October 2021
- Honesty Respect Conflict of Interest Science Policy Allegation of Misconduct Duty to Disclose Commercial Interest Primary Interest of Academic Practice Secondary2 KB (256 words) - 16:16, 25 August 2020
- Capacity Misrepresentation Allegation of Misconduct Academic Responsibility of University Research in a Personal Capacity Scope of University's Complaints2 KB (237 words) - 13:08, 25 August 2020
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)publication, the allegation was serious and the complainant had solid grounds for the validity of the allegation. Accordingly, TENK demanded that the institutions2 KB (228 words) - 15:53, 2 September 2020
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Respect Disparaging and Derogatory Remarks Inappropriate Behaviour Allegation of Misconduct Academic Reputation Engineering and Technology LS 07.01 - Medical2 KB (224 words) - 18:07, 8 March 2021
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good3 KB (316 words) - 16:33, 21 October 2020
- Reusing Biopsy Material in New Publications, Image Manipulation and Fraudulent Research Protocols (section Good Practices & Misconduct)Falsification Authorship Publication Ethics Image Manipulation Allegation of Misconduct Research Protocol Manipulation Reusing Published Material Reusing3 KB (339 words) - 19:07, 25 October 2020
- Honesty Respect Reliability Plagiarism Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good2 KB (277 words) - 16:31, 21 October 2020
- methodology. According to research misconduct guidelines from the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), when an allegation of misconduct is made to the organization5 KB (727 words) - 15:41, 10 June 2021
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity (section Listen to and Recognise the Early Views and Associated Reasons of All Other Members of the Committee)Responsibility Accountability Transparency Academic Responsibility of University Allegations of misconduct Communication Complaints procedure Ethical Dilemma Good12 KB (1,620 words) - 13:20, 8 August 2021
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland (section Finnish Guidance on the Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct)Accountability Honesty Reliability Respect Research Misconduct Institutional Responsibilities Allegation of Misconduct Whistleblowing Funders’ responsibilities Good4 KB (441 words) - 16:34, 21 October 2020
- Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges (section Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges)requires that “upon receiving an allegation of research misconduct,” the university must “immediately assess the allegation.” Thus UND appointed a faculty2 KB (184 words) - 16:11, 26 October 2020