Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Unwritten expectations in doctoral training: research integrity scenario + (PhD Students)
- Diner Pensant Workshop + (Researchers)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education + (Supervisors)
- Mentoring: minorities + (Minorities in academia)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity + (Academic institutions)
- Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies + (Doctoral students)
- Philosophical Justifications for Human Subjects Research + (Doctoral students)
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem + (Academic institutions)
- Psychologist made up sex bias results + (Academic institutions)
- Retraction of Savine, McDaniel, Shelton, and Scullin + (Academic institutions)
- Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training + (Graduate students)
- INSPIRE Checklist + (Policy makers)
- The INSPIRE project + (Policy makers)
- The decision on ice + (health care professionals)
- Mantra (research data management training) + (Early career researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud + (Researchers)
- Canaries in the Mines: Children, Risk, Non-Therapeutic Research, and Justice + (Researchers)
- Long Distance Collaboration + (Researchers)
- Posing irrelevant research questions + (Researchers)
- Polish National Science Centre Code on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing + (Researchers)
- Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research + (All stakeholders in research)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices + (Academic staff)
- Reaction to bias + (Women in academia)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on Responsible Supervision and Leadership - Supervision requirements & guidelines + (Academic staff)
- Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines + (Policy makers)
- Data sharing and dual-use issues + (Patients)
- European Charter of Patients' Rights + (Patients)
- Health Care Scheduling and Access: A Report From the IOM + (Patients)
- Improving the informed consent process-a booklet on participants' rights in medical research + (Patients)
- The decision on ice + (Patients)
- Vulnerable Populations + (Patients)
- The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availability + (Patients)
- SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact + (Patients)
- Consent for publication (Participant) + (Researchers)
- Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic + (All stakeholders in research)
- Declaration of Geneva + (Clinical ethics consultants)
- Informed consent in psychiatry + (Authors)
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct + (Academic staff)
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System + (Editors)
- 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper + (Researchers)
- Standards of authorship + (phd students)
- Can a scientific paper be published anonymously? + (Researchers)
- Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests + (Researchers)
- Peer review + (Scientists)
- COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation + (All stakeholders in research)
- Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3 + (Early career researchers)
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions + (Researchers)
- Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project + (Academic staff)
- Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching + (Academic staff)
- Unfair reviewing + (All stakeholders in research)
- Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines + (Peer reviewers)
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH) + (Peer reviewers)
- DOAB + (Researchers)
- Multiple submission + (Authors)