Difference between revisions of "Resource:Adad1721-62c8-46fd-83f9-617770437d90"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Is About=This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions<ref>http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/</ref>. This is a factual case.  
 
|Is About=This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions<ref>http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/</ref>. This is a factual case.  
 
<references />
 
<references />
|Important Because=When an author had a lot of retractions, one should be questioning his/her reliability.
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 10: Line 9:
 
|Has Link=http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/
 
|Has Link=http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Retraction Watch
 
|Involves=Retraction Watch

Revision as of 13:55, 20 May 2020

Cases

Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism

What is this about?

This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions[1]. This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6