Difference between revisions of "Resource:81d54c73-e442-47d8-923c-7576d7bdd60e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | |Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | ||
− | |Is About=This case is about | + | |Is About=This case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author. This is a factual case. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | This is a factual case. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 15: | Line 8: | ||
|Has Link=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/06/01/problem-michael-lacours-rebuttal/#.XBoikPnDJNr | |Has Link=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/06/01/problem-michael-lacours-rebuttal/#.XBoikPnDJNr | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
+ | |Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0 | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Michael LaCour | |Involves=Michael LaCour |
Revision as of 20:31, 26 May 2020
Resources
Cases
The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal
What is this about?
This case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author. This is a factual case.