Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
 
|Title=Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
|Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.
 
|Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
 
|Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
Line 17: Line 17:
 
|Has Location=USA; United States
 
|Has Location=USA; United States
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Factual case
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 10:42, 17 September 2020

Cases

Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct

What is this about?

This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.

Why is this important?

Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6