Difference between revisions of "Resource:81d54c73-e442-47d8-923c-7576d7bdd60e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal |
| − | |Is About=This case is about | + | |Is About=This factual case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 8: | ||
|Has Link=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/06/01/problem-michael-lacours-rebuttal/#.XBoikPnDJNr | |Has Link=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/06/01/problem-michael-lacours-rebuttal/#.XBoikPnDJNr | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | + | |Has Timepoint=1-6-2015; 2015 | |
| − | |Has Timepoint=1-6-2015 | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
Latest revision as of 10:04, 15 October 2020
ResourcesCases
One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal
What is this about?
This factual case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author.
