Difference between revisions of "Resource:49bf0570-f75c-4d0c-8b22-9ddaeb64631d"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=Bioethicists | + | |Title=Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People |
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=Factual cases of research on people without their approval. |
| − | |Important Because=Cases like these are | + | |Important Because=Cases like these are unethical and should be prevented and/or investigated for misconduct. |
| + | |Important For=researchers; General public; All stakeholders in research | ||
| + | |Has Best Practice=There are six tenets or principles: indigenous identity development, indigenous paradigmatic lens, reflexivity and power sharing, critical immersion, participation and accountability, and methodological flexibility. | ||
| − | + | See more at: [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1476750315622542 Guidance in the article published in Action Research.] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=http://www.cmaj.ca/content/185/14/1201 | |Has Link=http://www.cmaj.ca/content/185/14/1201 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Timepoint=1942 | |Has Timepoint=1942 | ||
|Has Location=Canada | |Has Location=Canada | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Vulnerable population; Informed consent; Patient safety | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Vulnerable population; Informed consent; Patient safety | ||
| − | |Related To Research Area= | + | |Related To Research Area=SH - Social Sciences and Humanities; LS - Life Sciences |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:23, 25 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
What is this about?
Factual cases of research on people without their approval.
Why is this important?
Cases like these are unethical and should be prevented and/or investigated for misconduct.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
There are six tenets or principles: indigenous identity development, indigenous paradigmatic lens, reflexivity and power sharing, critical immersion, participation and accountability, and methodological flexibility.
See more at: Guidance in the article published in Action Research.
