Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Final findings of scientific misconduct |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=https://grants.n...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
− | |Title=Final | + | |Title=Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct |
− | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. |
− | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable. |
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Has Link=https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-244.html | |Has Link=https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-244.html | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
+ | |Related To Resource=Resource:Acc068ac-a0c0-48fa-b6a2-ff7448bf2573;Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2;Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb | ||
+ | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
− | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | ||
− | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Factual case |
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:33, 25 October 2020
Resources
Cases
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.