Difference between revisions of "Instruction:2048c80f-44be-43e8-bf19-d9012c1208ba"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
|Instruction Step Title=Introduction to the climate-conscious methodology matrix
 
|Instruction Step Title=Introduction to the climate-conscious methodology matrix
|Instruction Step Text=Please go through the PowerPoint presentation
+
|Instruction Step Text=Please go through the PowerPoint presentation.
 
|Instruction Step Interactive Content=Resource:H5P-432
 
|Instruction Step Interactive Content=Resource:H5P-432
 
}}
 
}}
Line 38: Line 38:
 
*'''Build trust''' through careful planning and honest    communication
 
*'''Build trust''' through careful planning and honest    communication
  
*'''Support climate justice''' by including affected voices in all    stages of research.  
+
*'''Support climate justice''' by including affected voices in all    stages of research.
Have a look at how to use the cards. By clicking below. In the following steps 5 deks of cards are presented. Each of them addresses the following methodological components:
+
In the following steps 5 deks of cards are presented. Each of them addresses the following methodological components:
  
* Research design
+
 
* Assessment and measurement strategies
+
*Research design
* Data evaluation and interpretation
+
*Assessment and measurement strategies
* Ethical issues and scientific integrity
+
*Data evaluation and interpretation
* Communication of research findings
+
*Ethical issues and scientific integrity
 +
*Communication of research findings
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Have a look at how to use the cards by clicking on the link below.
 
|Instruction Step Interactive Content=Resource:H5P-434
 
|Instruction Step Interactive Content=Resource:H5P-434
 
}}
 
}}
Line 66: Line 70:
  
 
For each card, use the scenario to:
 
For each card, use the scenario to:
 +
 +
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
Line 76: Line 82:
  
 
OR use the scenario described above to:
 
OR use the scenario described above to:
 +
 +
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
Line 110: Line 118:
  
 
OR use the scenario described above to:
 
OR use the scenario described above to:
 +
 +
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Reflect''' on how the question applies in this setting.
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
 
*'''Identify''' possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).

Latest revision as of 18:21, 17 November 2025

Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for researchers and ethics reviewers)

Instructions for:TraineeTrainer
Related Initiative
Goal

By the end of this module, you should be able to:

Evaluate different approaches to research design in terms of fairness, inclusivity, and responsiveness to underrepresented communities.

Apply responsible research methods in citizen science or community engagement in climate-affected contexts.
Duration (hours)
0.8

What is this about?

This micromodule focuses on the intersection of climate justice, community collaboration, and citizen science in research and innovation. It uses conversation cards inspired by Valeria Berseth and Angeline Letourneau's (2024) on responsible research framework for ‘climate change-conscious methodologies. Applying the concepts mentioned in these cards to practical scenarios, the module encourages reflection on research methodologies that prioritize affected communities, foster fairness, and address shifting vulnerabilities in climate-related challenges.
1
Introduction to the climate-conscious methodology matrix

Please go through the PowerPoint presentation.

Introduction to the climate-conscious methodology matrix

2
Mini quiz (climate-conscious methodology matrix)

Please complete the multiple answers mini quiz

Mini quiz (climate-conscious methodology matrix)

3
How to use the conversation cards

The climate-conscious methodologies matrix helps researchers, students, and citizen scientists make ethical and responsible decisions in research. It is especially useful when working with climate-related impacts (such as floods, heatwaves, or droughts), with vulnerable or affected communities.

The tool encourages you to ask good questions throughout all stages of your research (from the early design to communication of results) and helps you adapt your methods while keeping fairness, safety, and community needs at the centre.

In a changing climate, traditional research methods may not work or may cause harm. Communities may be under stress. Researchers may face risks. By using the matrix, you can:


  • Stay flexible, but still do high-quality research
  • Respect local people and ecosystems
  • Build trust through careful planning and honest communication
  • Support climate justice by including affected voices in all stages of research.

In the following steps 5 deks of cards are presented. Each of them addresses the following methodological components:


  • Research design
  • Assessment and measurement strategies
  • Data evaluation and interpretation
  • Ethical issues and scientific integrity
  • Communication of research findings


Have a look at how to use the cards by clicking on the link below.

Conversation cards

4
Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Research design)

Use you own research to reflect on the cards questions

OR use the CASE STUDY EXAMPLE:

"Rebuilding with Dignity: Participatory Research in a Flooded Neighbourhood"

Context:

In the aftermath of devastating flash floods in the peri-urban district of Las Marismas, located on the low-lying outskirts of a Mediterranean city, a European research consortium initiates a climate adaptation project. The floods displaced over 1,500 residents, disproportionately affecting undocumented migrants, single mothers, and elderly locals who had settled in informal housing near riverbeds. Many residents feel abandoned by local authorities and express mistrust toward institutions, citing past experiences with extractive research and failed development promises.

The research project, funded under the EU’s Green Deal programme, aims to co-develop low-cost, community-led solutions for urban flood resilience. It includes both social and infrastructural components, such as local early-warning systems, nature-based stormwater management, and inclusive governance models. The research team comprises environmental engineers, social scientists, public health researchers, and local facilitators.


Imagine you are part of the team involved in this research. Your task is to use the cards to anticipate and address potential ethical and methodological challenges throughout the project.

For each card, use the scenario to:


5
Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Assessment + Measurement strategies)

Use you own research to reflect on the cards questions

OR use the scenario described above to:


6
Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Data evaluation and interpretation)

Use you own research to reflect on the cards questions

OR use the scenario described above to:


7
Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Ethical issues and scientific integrity)

Use you own research to reflect on the cards questions

OR use the scenario described above to:


  • Reflect on how the question applies in this setting.
  • Identify possible tensions or risks (e.g., exclusion, harm, extractivism).
Propose a climate-just, community-informed course of action.

Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Ethical issues and scientific integrity)

8
Card Deck - for researchers and ethic reviewers (Communication of research findings)

Use you own research to reflect on the cards questions

OR use the scenario described above to:


Steps

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.2.9