Difference between revisions of "Resource:75d1fe41-31cd-4ac5-b70d-5fdde322989c"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire
+
|Title=Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines
|Is About=This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics  in 2011 and 2012.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
 
 
 
 
This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=It is important to stay critical in all cases.
 
 
 
 
 
Website Blog (Retractionwatch)
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 15: Line 8:
 
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2020/01/08/who-formally-retracts-opioid-guidelines-that-came-under-fire/
 
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2020/01/08/who-formally-retracts-opioid-guidelines-that-came-under-fire/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 +
|Involves=Retraction Watch
 
|Has Timepoint=10-1-2020
 
|Has Timepoint=10-1-2020
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability

Latest revision as of 14:51, 26 October 2020

Cases

Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6