Difference between revisions of "Resource:49c12056-f90d-4d3a-8d23-e15755ccfa6b"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Conflicts with Community Leaders | |Title=Conflicts with Community Leaders | ||
| − | |Is About=This fictional case is about an infectious disease researcher | + | |Is About=This fictional case is about an infectious disease researcher who is conducting a survey with men who are HIV positive and sexually active with partners of both sexes. This research contains sensitive information and the community leaders of the research population are not pleased with its results. |
| − | |Important Because=When doing a research concerning a sensitive subject, it is important to think about the effect the results can have on the research population. | + | |Important Because=When doing a research concerning a sensitive subject, it is important to think about the effect the results can have on the research population and to . |
| − | |Important For=Researchers; Ethics committee members; Funders | + | |Important For=Researchers; Ethics committee members; Funders; General public; Research Integrity Officers |
| + | |Has Best Practice=Researchers can consult the following guidelines on collaboration with communities: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Kate Chatfield et al. (2018) Research with, not about, communities - Ethical guidance towards empowerment in collaborative research, a report for the TRUST project. http://trust-project.eu/ | ||
| + | * Figueiredo Nascimento, S., Cuccillato, E., Schade, S., Guimarães Pereira, A. (2016) Citizen Engagement in Science and Policy-Making. doi:10.2788/40563 https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/sites/jrccties/files/mc10_rio_sio-lopez_mobility_reading.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:F52ff816-1035-46a4-bf92-a5f6a349f787 |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability; Care |
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct= | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Impact; Social responsibility |
|Related To Research Area=Health sciences | |Related To Research Area=Health sciences | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:35, 11 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Conflicts with Community Leaders
What is this about?
This fictional case is about an infectious disease researcher who is conducting a survey with men who are HIV positive and sexually active with partners of both sexes. This research contains sensitive information and the community leaders of the research population are not pleased with its results.
Why is this important?
When doing a research concerning a sensitive subject, it is important to think about the effect the results can have on the research population and to .
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
Researchers can consult the following guidelines on collaboration with communities:
- Kate Chatfield et al. (2018) Research with, not about, communities - Ethical guidance towards empowerment in collaborative research, a report for the TRUST project. http://trust-project.eu/
- Figueiredo Nascimento, S., Cuccillato, E., Schade, S., Guimarães Pereira, A. (2016) Citizen Engagement in Science and Policy-Making. doi:10.2788/40563 https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/communities/sites/jrccties/files/mc10_rio_sio-lopez_mobility_reading.pdf
