Difference between revisions of "Resource:3cadb4be-b312-4afa-a723-4e12c4a801f3"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News | |Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News | ||
| − | |Is About=This case is | + | |Is About=This factual case reports a failure to declare a conflict of interest by researchers of experimental interventions at a university. The researchers studied a disputed therapy that is endorsed by a controversial organization. According to the university and the publisher, the researchers failed to declare that they had affiliations with the organization. However, the authors stated in a press release on the situation that they did declare their conflicts of interest in all instances. |
| − | |Important Because= | + | |Important Because=Conflicts of interest may lead to the introduction of biases in research studies. This is especially the case when the product or drugs under investigation are produced by a company, as this may lead to corruption. Recent research shows that more favourable results are obtained for company-sponsored than non-company-sponsored studies.<ref>Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1603-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5293-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PMID: 30132025.</ref> Therefore, it is important for researchers to declare all potential conflicts of interest. Undeclared conflicts of interests, such as in the present case, may cast considerable doubt on the objectivity of the researchers. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | <references /> |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Universities; Journal editors; Journals; Journal publishers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0 | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0;Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320 |
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Involves= | + | |Involves=Retraction Watch |
|Has Timepoint=19-4-2018 | |Has Timepoint=19-4-2018 | ||
|Has Location=Australia | |Has Location=Australia | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value= | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Transparency; Reproducibility; Accountability |
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; Data management; Retraction |
| + | |Related To Research Area=LS 07 - Diagnostic Tools, Therapies and Public Health; LS 05 - Neurosciences and Neural Disorders | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:59, 19 August 2021
ResourcesCases
Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
What is this about?
This factual case reports a failure to declare a conflict of interest by researchers of experimental interventions at a university. The researchers studied a disputed therapy that is endorsed by a controversial organization. According to the university and the publisher, the researchers failed to declare that they had affiliations with the organization. However, the authors stated in a press release on the situation that they did declare their conflicts of interest in all instances.
Why is this important?
Conflicts of interest may lead to the introduction of biases in research studies. This is especially the case when the product or drugs under investigation are produced by a company, as this may lead to corruption. Recent research shows that more favourable results are obtained for company-sponsored than non-company-sponsored studies.[1] Therefore, it is important for researchers to declare all potential conflicts of interest. Undeclared conflicts of interests, such as in the present case, may cast considerable doubt on the objectivity of the researchers.
- ↑ Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1603-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5293-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PMID: 30132025.
