Difference between revisions of "Resource:3f71447b-3d00-47a0-94af-720040d717ae"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Guidelines | |Resource Type=Guidelines | ||
| − | |Title=How to | + | |Title=Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes |
|Is About=This document presents a guide for young researchers on the area of authorship, which many people agree is one of the more confused areas. It helps new researchers prevent and resolve authorship problems. In particular it provides: | |Is About=This document presents a guide for young researchers on the area of authorship, which many people agree is one of the more confused areas. It helps new researchers prevent and resolve authorship problems. In particular it provides: | ||
| − | * suggestions for good authorship practice that should reduce the incidence of such dilemmas, | + | *suggestions for good authorship practice that should reduce the incidence of such dilemmas, |
| − | * advice on what to do when authorship problems do arise, and | + | *advice on what to do when authorship problems do arise, and |
| − | * a glossary of key concepts in authorship, with some reading lists and websites for those who wish to take this further. | + | *a glossary of key concepts in authorship, with some reading lists and websites for those who wish to take this further. |
| + | |||
| + | <br /> | ||
|Important Because=Many people (both editors and investigators) feel that the misrepresentation of authorship is a form of research misconduct, and that honesty in reporting science should extend to authorship. They argue that, if scientists are dishonest about their relationship to their work, this undermines confidence in the reporting of the work itself. | |Important Because=Many people (both editors and investigators) feel that the misrepresentation of authorship is a form of research misconduct, and that honesty in reporting science should extend to authorship. They argue that, if scientists are dishonest about their relationship to their work, this undermines confidence in the reporting of the work itself. | ||
|Important For=Early career researchers; Junior researchers; PhD Students; Postdocs | |Important For=Early career researchers; Junior researchers; PhD Students; Postdocs | ||
Latest revision as of 12:01, 20 October 2020
ResourcesGuidelines
Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes
What is this about?
This document presents a guide for young researchers on the area of authorship, which many people agree is one of the more confused areas. It helps new researchers prevent and resolve authorship problems. In particular it provides:
- suggestions for good authorship practice that should reduce the incidence of such dilemmas,
- advice on what to do when authorship problems do arise, and
- a glossary of key concepts in authorship, with some reading lists and websites for those who wish to take this further.
Why is this important?
Many people (both editors and investigators) feel that the misrepresentation of authorship is a form of research misconduct, and that honesty in reporting science should extend to authorship. They argue that, if scientists are dishonest about their relationship to their work, this undermines confidence in the reporting of the work itself.
