Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ea84de30-5f0c-4fc8-a57f-e61b53d03544"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=This factual case describes a covert sociological study on the work culture of nightlife bouncers. The author describes both practical and ethical problems he encountered during his research which resulted from its covert nature. However, he argues that the research would not have been possible without its secrecy. | |Is About=This factual case describes a covert sociological study on the work culture of nightlife bouncers. The author describes both practical and ethical problems he encountered during his research which resulted from its covert nature. However, he argues that the research would not have been possible without its secrecy. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | |Important Because=The practice of covert research in sociology has been a long subject of debate. It has received much criticism due to the deception of | + | |Important Because=The practice of covert research in sociology has been a long subject of debate. It has received much criticism due to the deception of research subjects, among other objections.<ref>Homan, R. (1980) ‘The Ethics of Covert Methods’, British Journal of Sociology 31 (1): 36–59.</ref><ref>Homan, R. (1991) The Ethics of Social Research. London: Macmillan.</ref> Nonetheless, covert research methods may also have beneficial effects, as outlined in the present case. This may be especially true in the fields of sociology and social sciences, where it is important not to disturb the behavioral and cultural patterns under study. It is important to take both the beneficial effects and ethical objections into consideration when determining the justifiability of covert research practice. The present case may aid in the identification of beneficial consequences, while it may also help to prepare sociologists for the problems they may encounter during a covert study. <br /> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=Researchers; Research Ethics Committees; Sociologists | |Important For=Researchers; Research Ethics Committees; Sociologists |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 19 August 2021
The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field
What is this about?
This factual case describes a covert sociological study on the work culture of nightlife bouncers. The author describes both practical and ethical problems he encountered during his research which resulted from its covert nature. However, he argues that the research would not have been possible without its secrecy.
Why is this important?
The practice of covert research in sociology has been a long subject of debate. It has received much criticism due to the deception of research subjects, among other objections.[1][2] Nonetheless, covert research methods may also have beneficial effects, as outlined in the present case. This may be especially true in the fields of sociology and social sciences, where it is important not to disturb the behavioral and cultural patterns under study. It is important to take both the beneficial effects and ethical objections into consideration when determining the justifiability of covert research practice. The present case may aid in the identification of beneficial consequences, while it may also help to prepare sociologists for the problems they may encounter during a covert study.