Difference between revisions of "Resource:3d565816-370d-43a0-8cef-acb00f74f325"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research
+
|Title=The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
|Is About=This paper summarizes the Hwang debacle with particular attention to the egg scandal and ends with some preliminary thoughts on patriotism as a motive for research participation<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-009-9118-0</ref>.
+
|Is About=This paper summarizes the debacle with particular attention to the egg scandal and ends with some preliminary thoughts on patriotism as a motive for research participation<ref>Baylis, Francoise. "For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research." ''Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics'' 30.5 (2009): 385.</ref>. This is a factual case.
 
 
 
 
This is a factual case.
 
 
<references />
 
<references />
|Important Because=In 2004 and 2005, Woo-Suk Hwang achieved international stardom with publications in Science reporting on successful research involving the creation of stem cells from cloned human embryos. The wonder and success all began to unravel, however, when serious ethical concerns were raised about the source of the eggs for this research. When the egg scandal had completely unfolded, it turned out that many of the women who provided eggs for stem cell research had not provided valid consents and that nearly 75% of the women egg providers had received cash or in-kind payments. Among those who did not receive direct benefits, some cited patriotism as their reason for participating in embryonic stem cell research, hence the question ‘‘for love or money?’’—namely, patriotism versus payment<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-009-9118-0</ref>.
+
|Important Because=In 2004 and 2005, X achieved international stardom with publications in Science reporting on successful research involving the creation of stem cells from cloned human embryos. The wonder and success all began to unravel, however, when serious ethical concerns were raised about the source of the eggs for this research. When the egg scandal had completely unfolded, it turned out that many of the women who provided eggs for stem cell research had not provided valid consents and that nearly 75% of the women egg providers had received cash or in-kind payments. Among those who did not receive direct benefits, some cited patriotism as their reason for participating in embryonic stem cell research, hence the question ‘for love or money?’namely, patriotism versus payment<ref>Baylis, Francoise. "For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research." ''Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics'' 30.5 (2009): 385.</ref>.<references />
 
 
 
 
Journal<references />
 
 
|Important For=researchers; research leaders
 
|Important For=researchers; research leaders
 
}}
 
}}
Line 16: Line 10:
 
|Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-009-9118-0
 
|Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-009-9118-0
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Woo Suk Hwang
 
|Involves=Woo Suk Hwang

Revision as of 15:03, 26 May 2020

Cases

The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

What is this about?

This paper summarizes the debacle with particular attention to the egg scandal and ends with some preliminary thoughts on patriotism as a motive for research participation[1]. This is a factual case.

  1. Baylis, Francoise. "For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30.5 (2009): 385.

Why is this important?

In 2004 and 2005, X achieved international stardom with publications in Science reporting on successful research involving the creation of stem cells from cloned human embryos. The wonder and success all began to unravel, however, when serious ethical concerns were raised about the source of the eggs for this research. When the egg scandal had completely unfolded, it turned out that many of the women who provided eggs for stem cell research had not provided valid consents and that nearly 75% of the women egg providers had received cash or in-kind payments. Among those who did not receive direct benefits, some cited patriotism as their reason for participating in embryonic stem cell research, hence the question ‘for love or money?’namely, patriotism versus payment[1].
  1. Baylis, Francoise. "For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research." Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30.5 (2009): 385.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6