Difference between revisions of "Resource:E99e20d0-8116-4d77-84ec-7df396703bf4"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Education |Title=Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project |Is About=Members of...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to stimulate strategic thinking about issues in research ethics and research integrity. | |Is About=Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to stimulate strategic thinking about issues in research ethics and research integrity. | ||
| − | This scenario presents a hypothetical narrative concerning the [https:// | + | This scenario presents a hypothetical narrative concerning the '''[https://zenodo.org/record/4063633#.X3cGu5NKjxQ safeguards required for data-sharing and data disclosure practices]'''. |
It focuses on issues regarding: | It focuses on issues regarding: | ||
| − | * The ethical and regulatory standards governing data-sharing practices; | + | *The ethical and regulatory standards governing data-sharing practices; |
| − | * The ethical dimensions of research involving children; | + | *The ethical dimensions of research involving children; |
| − | * Amendments to research ethics protocols; | + | *Amendments to research ethics protocols; |
| − | * Research participant complaints against researchers; | + | *Research participant complaints against researchers; |
| − | * Disclosure of sensitive research results. | + | *Disclosure of sensitive research results. |
It is interspersed with questions and resource suggestions that help guide researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators in their deliberations concerning the research integrity issues raised by the narrative. | It is interspersed with questions and resource suggestions that help guide researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators in their deliberations concerning the research integrity issues raised by the narrative. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
3) Research Procedures | 3) Research Procedures | ||
| − | 4) [https:// | + | 4) [https://zenodo.org/record/4063633#.X3cGu5NKjxQ Safeguards] |
5) Data Practices and Management | 5) Data Practices and Management | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| − | |Has Link=https:// | + | |Has Link=https://zenodo.org/record/4063633#.X3cGu5NKjxQ |
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3;Resource:C99f17ec-3d1e-4f7a-bfc7-3e3607934ead;Resource:F6100097-fddb-4c77-9098-1bc767c34a6a;Resource:1d26fd13-1ced-44bc-8d19-e094b37f8f70 | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3;Resource:C99f17ec-3d1e-4f7a-bfc7-3e3607934ead;Resource:F6100097-fddb-4c77-9098-1bc767c34a6a;Resource:1d26fd13-1ced-44bc-8d19-e094b37f8f70;Resource:45a04c31-5a75-4816-8484-2dd9b71d1674 |
|Related To Theme=Theme:E5629f68-81f6-490d-84d6-fd1e63b8dbc7;Theme:A1a1b736-7002-405c-8375-711a11f20e04;Theme:0d054575-ca21-4209-b7c5-6120fc0ed647;Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9;Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd;Theme:61d9a3f5-8f8b-4f6f-8363-fa53f959f131 | |Related To Theme=Theme:E5629f68-81f6-490d-84d6-fd1e63b8dbc7;Theme:A1a1b736-7002-405c-8375-711a11f20e04;Theme:0d054575-ca21-4209-b7c5-6120fc0ed647;Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9;Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd;Theme:61d9a3f5-8f8b-4f6f-8363-fa53f959f131 | ||
|Related To Instruction=Instruction:312681e3-96e5-4ebe-85f7-6fa2947d1f4a | |Related To Instruction=Instruction:312681e3-96e5-4ebe-85f7-6fa2947d1f4a | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 2 October 2020
ResourcesScenarios
Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
What is this about?
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to stimulate strategic thinking about issues in research ethics and research integrity.
This scenario presents a hypothetical narrative concerning the safeguards required for data-sharing and data disclosure practices.
It focuses on issues regarding:
- The ethical and regulatory standards governing data-sharing practices;
- The ethical dimensions of research involving children;
- Amendments to research ethics protocols;
- Research participant complaints against researchers;
- Disclosure of sensitive research results.
Why is this important?
The scenarios are designed to help researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to become better acquainted with The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity ('ECCRI' or 'ECoC') as a regulatory document that articulates the standards of good research practice.
They also allow users to reflect on and apply their own national and institutional research ethics and research integrity codes as well as other key regulatory documents and guidelines.
The goal is for the user to gain knowledge of the standards associated with good research practices and to make sense of these standards in different research contexts.
According to the ECCRI/ECoC, there are eight categories of research contexts that are covered by the standards of good research practice:
1) Research Environment
2) Training, Supervision and Mentoring
3) Research Procedures
4) Safeguards
5) Data Practices and Management
6) Collaborative Working
7) Publication and Dissemination
8) Reviewing, Evaluating and EditingFor whom is this important?
Academic staffAdministratorsDoctoral studentsPostdocsEarly career researchersEthics committee membersResearch Ethics CommitteesGraduate studentsJunior researchersPhD StudentsProfessorsResearch Integrity OfficersResearchersSupervisorsUniversitiesResearch institutionsResearch subjects
What are the best practices?
The aim of all eight scenarios is to allow researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to focus their reflection on core principles and research contexts that enshrine good research practice as well as their local rules and practices.
Other information
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
- Allegation of Misconduct
- Balancing harms and benefits
- Complaints procedure
- Confidentiality
- Consent
- Data Protection
- Data sharing
- Good Practice
- Harm
- Misconduct Investigations
- Ownership
- Personal Information
- Safety
- Safeguards
- Privacy
- REC approval
- Research ethics
- Research with Humans
- Responsibility
- Social responsibilities
- Vulnerable and non-competent subjects
