Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Resource= | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:Acc068ac-a0c0-48fa-b6a2-ff7448bf2573;Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2;Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb |
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 21 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
