The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 20:40, 26 May 2020 by Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs)
ResourcesCases
The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct
What is this about?
The Office of Research Integrity found in 2011 that a postdoctoral researcher who sabotaged a colleague’s research materials, was guilty of misconduct[1]. This case describes when something is considered as scientific misconduct and whether this really was the case. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Rasmussen, Lisa M. "The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct." Science and engineering ethics 20.2 (2014): 411-421.
Why is this important?
When accuding someone for committing scientific fraud, it is important that the definition is clear en interpretative by everybody.
