The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct
From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 21:40, 26 May 2020 by Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs)
ResourcesCases
The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct
What is this about?
The Office of Research Integrity found in 2011 that a postdoctoral researcher who sabotaged a colleague’s research materials, was guilty of misconduct[1]. This case describes when something is considered as scientific misconduct and whether this really was the case. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
When accuding someone for committing scientific fraud, it is important that the definition is clear en interpretative by everybody.
For whom is this important?
Other information
Who
When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
References
- ↑ Rasmussen, Lisa M. "The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct." Science and engineering ethics 20.2 (2014): 411-421.
