Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes
Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes
What is this about?
Why is this important?
Academic journals, similarly to academic institutions and individual researchers, strive for recognition, esteem and resources. This case is important because it provides an explanation of how, despite the similarities of these two incidents (in both case A & B, the journals dramatically improved their JIF as a result of a single published article), there were two very different outcomes (in case A, the journal was revoked for the following year, whilst in case B, there were no adverse consequences for the journal). To quote the paper’s stated importance of the case, these two incidents indicate the ‘possible flaws in the citation indexes and the review process’ (p.100-1)[:File:///D:/ENTIRE/cases/Case description/Description of cases draft1.docx#%20ftn1 [1]].
The paper discusses individuals’ and institutions’ motivations for publishing but also the dangers of the pressures to publish. Furthermore, it considers the value, but also the flaws, of the citation index systems. Finally, it provides some examples of good editorial practices and recommendations for responding to such flaws.
[:File:///D:/ENTIRE/cases/Case description/Description of cases draft1.docx#%20ftnref1 [1]] Foo JY. Implications of a single highly cited article on a journal and its citation indexes: a tale of two journals. Account Res. 2013;20(2):93-106. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.767124. PMID: 23432771