LoginSign up

Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC)
  2. Sharing and preserving data in repositories
  3. Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
  4. Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching
  5. High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)
  6. Research with humans
  7. Replicability in the Humanities
  8. Gene Editing: Ethical Frontiers and Scientific Integrity
  9. Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
  10. Research with animals
  11. Intellectual conflicts of interest
  12. Responsible use of AI in peer review
  13. Industry-funded continuing medical education – ethical conundrums
  14. Industry funded research
  15. The ethical dilemmas of genome editing
  16. Research collaboration
  17. Publication bias (positive results)
  18. Inappropriate study design
  19. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
  20. Balancing harms and benefits
  21. Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
  22. Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)
  23. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
  24. Self-plagiarism
  25. Prioritising interventions and reproducibility measures to improve research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation method
  26. Perverse incentives
  27. Informed assent
  28. Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
  29. Fake peer-reviewing
  30. Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI
  31. Whistleblower protection/rights
  32. The ConScience App - theatre play
  33. Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
  34. Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
  35. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
  36. Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
  37. Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
  38. Journal peer review
  39. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
  40. Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
  41. Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
  42. The Ghost Collaborator
  43. ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
  44. Data sharing and dual-use issues
  45. Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
  46. Who Owns the Field Notes
  47. The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
  48. Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
  49. POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science
  50. Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:ApprovedRevs"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Bluesky Logo.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.9.1