Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
- Journal peer review
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
- Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Data sharing and dual-use issues
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
- Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
- POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science
- Open Access Policy (2017) — Austrian Science Fund
- Open Access in Germany (2013), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Declaration of Helsinki
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
- Science Ethics Code of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (2010), Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- Implementing Research Ethics Governance in HEIs and RPOs
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
- Authorship and Intellectual Property
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Funders
- National Research Integrity Framework of Tanzania (2020)
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
- SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Whistle-blower Claims his Accusations Cost him his Job
- Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
- Online Module: Research Misconduct
- Psychology Grad Student Faked Data
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
