Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- In the matter of J Hendrik Schön
- Banked Samples and HD Testing
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH)
- FOSTER project workshop
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas
- The Three Rs of Animal Research
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study
- What to communicate in retraction notices?
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice
- Anonymity Revisited
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy
- Instilling scholarly integrity
- It’s Still Plagiarism
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
- Slow Code
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet
- Responsible science: vol. 2
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Science Foundation (April 2018)
- Credit for work
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS)
- Reproducibility training
- Protecting Research Subjects
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
