Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Research collaboration
- Publication bias (positive results)
- Inappropriate study design
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
- Balancing harms and benefits
- Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
- Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)
- Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
- Self-plagiarism
- Prioritising interventions and reproducibility measures to improve research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation method
- Perverse incentives
- Informed assent
- Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
- Fake peer-reviewing
- Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI
- Whistleblower protection/rights
- The ConScience App - theatre play
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
- Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
- Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
- Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
- Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
- Journal peer review
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
- Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Data sharing and dual-use issues
- Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
- Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
- POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
- Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
- Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science
- Open Access Policy (2017) — Austrian Science Fund
- Open Access in Germany (2013), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Declaration of Helsinki
- SOPs4RI Guidelines - Building and leading an effective team
