Pages without language links

From The Embassy of Good Science

The following pages do not link to other language versions.

50 rwikis ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching
  2. High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)
  3. Research with humans
  4. Replicability in the Humanities
  5. Gene Editing: Ethical Frontiers and Scientific Integrity
  6. Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
  7. Research with animals
  8. Intellectual conflicts of interest
  9. Industry funded research
  10. The ethical dilemmas of genome editing
  11. Research collaboration
  12. Publication bias (positive results)
  13. Inappropriate study design
  14. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
  15. Balancing harms and benefits
  16. Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
  17. Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)
  18. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
  19. Self-plagiarism
  20. Perverse incentives
  21. Informed assent
  22. Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
  23. Fake peer-reviewing
  24. Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI
  25. Whistleblower protection/rights
  26. The ConScience App - theatre play
  27. Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
  28. Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
  29. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
  30. Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
  31. Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
  32. Journal peer review
  33. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
  34. Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
  35. Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
  36. The Ghost Collaborator
  37. ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
  38. Data sharing and dual-use issues
  39. Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
  40. Who Owns the Field Notes
  41. The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
  42. Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
  43. POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science
  44. Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
  45. Data anonymity
  46. Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
  47. Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
  48. New claim to authorship of published paper
  49. Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
  50. Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.2.9