Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) Attempting to Assure Accuracy [1,096 bytes]
- (hist) Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [1,095 bytes]
- (hist) Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health [1,093 bytes]
- (hist) Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct [1,093 bytes]
- (hist) PATTERN [1,091 bytes]
- (hist) Journalist who fabricated his reports [1,089 bytes]
- (hist) Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors [1,087 bytes]
- (hist) Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe [1,087 bytes]
- (hist) Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction [1,085 bytes]
- (hist) Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) Collaboration dispute [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) Training materials [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? [1,083 bytes]
- (hist) EU-LIFE [1,080 bytes]
- (hist) Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing [1,079 bytes]
- (hist) Ten short cases on publication ethics [1,079 bytes]
- (hist) Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity [1,078 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed [1,075 bytes]
- (hist) UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science [1,073 bytes]
- (hist) KU LEUVEN- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law [1,070 bytes]
- (hist) Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd [1,069 bytes]
- (hist) Ethical issues in research and publication [1,068 bytes]
- (hist) How Earnest Research Into Gay Genetics Went Wrong [1,068 bytes]
- (hist) Australian Codes for the Responsible Conduct of Research [1,067 bytes]
- (hist) Herbicide Resistant Rice [1,067 bytes]
- (hist) Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past [1,066 bytes]
- (hist) How trustworthy? [1,066 bytes]
- (hist) Integrity in scientific research videos [1,066 bytes]
- (hist) Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review [1,063 bytes]
- (hist) Independent Research Fund Denmark – Open Access Policy and Dissemination Guidelines [1,062 bytes]
- (hist) FOSTER project workshop [1,061 bytes]
- (hist) Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud [1,060 bytes]
- (hist) The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity [1,059 bytes]
- (hist) Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct [1,059 bytes]
- (hist) Law on Science and Studies of the Republic of Lithuania [1,058 bytes]
- (hist) The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers [1,053 bytes]
- (hist) Tongan children’s involvement in research [1,052 bytes]
- (hist) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects [1,051 bytes]
- (hist) Ethics in Social Science and Humanities [1,051 bytes]
- (hist) Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects [1,049 bytes]
- (hist) Unhelpful retraction notice about a study that received favourable media attention [1,049 bytes]
- (hist) European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) Meta-Code of Ethics [1,049 bytes]
- (hist) Veterinary scientist fabricates data and manipulates images [1,047 bytes]
- (hist) Disclosing Research Findings [1,046 bytes]
- (hist) Development of an institutional curriculum in ethics and public health [1,044 bytes]
- (hist) The French CNRS Ethics Committee's Guide to Integrity and Responsibility in Research Practices [1,040 bytes]
- (hist) Educational approaches to the responsible conduct of clinical research: an exploratory study [1,040 bytes]
- (hist) The Ethics Codes Collection [1,037 bytes]
- (hist) Portuguese National Council of Ethics for the Life Sciences Recommendation on Integrity in Scientific Research [1,036 bytes]
- (hist) Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research [1,036 bytes]
