Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People [1,133 bytes]
- (hist) Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly [1,131 bytes]
- (hist) A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Disputes in Authorship (1) [1,128 bytes]
- (hist) LIRIcs - Leuven Institutional Research Integrity culture and self-reflection on-line course [1,127 bytes]
- (hist) Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds [1,127 bytes]
- (hist) Best Practice Guide for Research Integrity and Ethics [1,127 bytes]
- (hist) Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct [1,125 bytes]
- (hist) Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity [1,123 bytes]
- (hist) Long Distance Collaboration [1,122 bytes]
- (hist) Image manipulation research [1,116 bytes]
- (hist) Research misconduct in a grant application for the National Institutes of Health [1,112 bytes]
- (hist) Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct [1,112 bytes]
- (hist) Pressure to disclose confidential research findings [1,110 bytes]
- (hist) Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study [1,110 bytes]
- (hist) Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others [1,109 bytes]
- (hist) Government Sanctions Harvard Psychologist [1,107 bytes]
- (hist) Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research. [1,106 bytes]
- (hist) Research Integrity in Retrospective Clinical Studies [1,106 bytes]
- (hist) Mentoring: time constraints [1,104 bytes]
- (hist) Lithuanian Implementation and Maintenance Recommendations for Higher Education Institutions [1,099 bytes]
- (hist) M-power [1,098 bytes]
- (hist) Statutes and Procedures of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [1,095 bytes]
- (hist) Attempting to Assure Accuracy [1,095 bytes]
- (hist) Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed [1,094 bytes]
- (hist) PATTERN [1,091 bytes]
- (hist) Journalist who fabricated his reports [1,089 bytes]
- (hist) Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe [1,087 bytes]
- (hist) Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors [1,086 bytes]
- (hist) Herbicide Resistant Rice [1,086 bytes]
- (hist) Integrity in scientific research videos [1,085 bytes]
- (hist) Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) Training materials [1,084 bytes]
- (hist) Collaboration dispute [1,083 bytes]
- (hist) One in six of the papers you cite in a review has been retracted. What do you do? [1,082 bytes]
- (hist) Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies [1,081 bytes]
- (hist) EU-LIFE [1,080 bytes]
- (hist) Ten short cases on publication ethics [1,079 bytes]
- (hist) Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity [1,078 bytes]
- (hist) Self-plagiarism and suspected salami publishing [1,078 bytes]
- (hist) Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct [1,078 bytes]
- (hist) UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science [1,073 bytes]
- (hist) KU LEUVEN- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law [1,070 bytes]
- (hist) Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd [1,069 bytes]
- (hist) Ethical issues in research and publication [1,068 bytes]
- (hist) How Earnest Research Into Gay Genetics Went Wrong [1,068 bytes]
- (hist) Australian Codes for the Responsible Conduct of Research [1,067 bytes]
- (hist) Greek Cypriot students’ ideas of historical empathy: a case study exploration of 9 -12 years old students’ ideas about practices in the past [1,066 bytes]
- (hist) How trustworthy? [1,066 bytes]
- (hist) Independent Research Fund Denmark – Open Access Policy and Dissemination Guidelines [1,062 bytes]
