What are the best practices? (Has Best Practice)
From The Embassy of Good Science
S
SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on the research integrity education of post-doctorate and senior researchers +
Given the broad diversity that exists among research institutions, it is possible that some recommendations are not applicable in all research settings. For this reason, the guidelines should not be seen as a ‘one-size-fits-all’, but rather as a tool that can be used flexibly and adapted to meet institutions’ specific needs. +
Given the broad diversity that exists among research institutions, it is possible that some recommendations are not applicable in all research settings. For this reason, the guidelines should not be seen as a ‘one-size-fits-all’, but rather as a tool that can be used flexibly and adapted to meet institutions’ specific needs.
Furthermore, several best practices are highlighted in the guidelines itself +
Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project +
The aim of all eight scenarios is to allow researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to focus their reflection on core principles and research contexts that enshrine good research practice as well as their local rules and practices. +
Authors highlight the role that organisations such as the US Office of Research Integrity or the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty can play in streamlining the process of dealing with cases of misconduct. +
It shows that researchers' responsibilities towards their projects and collected data extends beyond the duration of their employement in a particular research institute. +
Specific advice for authors: "Do not put your name on a manuscript written by someone else. • Do not insert someone else’s text as a place-holder in a draft manuscript. The original might not be replaced later. • Do not copy verbatim the background section of someone else’s paper. Copying an amount beyond fair use might violate copyright law. The background section could be incomplete or erroneous. A subsequent inquiry or investigation would consume a lot of time from faculty and administrators, and it could embarrass the institution. • Include references to all sources, with appropriate citations, in all manuscripts and grant proposals. • Take allegations of plagiarism to a research integrity officer. If there is no research integrity officer, then consult a knowledgeable administrator"'"`UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU`"'
'"`UNIQ--references-00000003-QINU`"' +
- Establishing research networks
- Quality assessment of scientific training +
- Maintaining an equal gender distribution in evaluation panels
- Ensuring that the gender ratio among grant awardees is representative of that of the applicants
- Ensuring that men and women have equal success rates in grant applications
- Incorporate gender equality into analysis, evaluation and communication +
- Early identification of potential conflicts of interest
- Preventing conflicts of interest: by notifying council members or colleagues in the evaluation panel, avoiding handling applications which could be potentially conflicting +
- Obligations to list authors
- Authorship requirements
- Procedure for determining authorship
- Order of authorship
- Authors' responsibility
- Acknowledgements +
This guideline has best practice recommendations with respect to
- Institutional structures
- Collaborations
- Publication and dissemination
- Authorship
- Data management
- Assessment and evaluation
- Research process
- Private funding +
T
'''Frameworks for Data Privacy and Security:''' To protect patient privacy during telemedicine consultations, researchers have created encrypted platforms. Health Level Seven (HL7) standards, for example, provide safe data transfer in accordance with HIPAA and GDPR, two laws governing the healthcare industry.
'''Equity in Access:''' Some research focuses on removing obstacles to digital literacy by creating user-friendly interfaces or offering healthcare providers and patients training. To increase access, telemedicine is frequently integrated with regional healthcare networks in rural pilot initiatives.
'''Ethics Training for Researchers:''' Academic institutions and organizations provide researchers specialized ethics training that covers topics such as addressing cultural sensitivity in telemedicine and obtaining informed consent for virtual interventions.
'''Case Studies Following Pandemics:''' Lessons learnt from COVID-19 have been brought to light by research, including the significance of adaptability in providing hybrid telemedicine and in-person care models to meet the needs of a wide range of patients.
References:
# Chaet D, Clearfield R, Sabin JE, Skimming K. Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2017 Jun 26;32(10):1136–40.
# Greiwe J. Telemedicine Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. 2022 Jan 21.
# Khoong EC, Sharma AE, Gupta K, Adler-Milstein J, Sarkar U. The Abrupt Expansion of Ambulatory Telemedicine: Implications for Patient Safety. Journal of General Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2022 Jan 19;37(5):1270–4. +
The Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports' Law on Scientific Activity and Higher Education' +
- Regulation and quality assurance in higher education
- General provisions of scientific work
- Academic freedom and responsibilities
- Academic collaborations +
- Management of the research process
- Research results and idssemination +
- Policy measures to prevent undue influence
- Emphasis on personal scientific integrity +
There are hundreds of different reporting guidelines which an author can choose from. Selecting the right guideline seems difficult, but has been made easier with the use of a few tools. [http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20160226-RG-decision-tree-for-Wizard-CC-BY-26-February-2016.pdf This flowchart] depicts in several easy steps which of the most common research methods (i.e. systematic review, randomized trials, observational studies) match a reporting guideline. If you have a more specific study, [https://www.penelope.ai/equator-wizard this reporting guideline wizard] was developed to reveal which guideline you can use. Please visit the [http://www.equator-network.org/ EQUATOR Network] for more information on reporting medical research. +
- Transparency regarding proposal authorship and collaborations
- Cautious use of authorship information by RFOs
- Transparency regarding misconduct procedures
- Avoiding duplicate funding +
The German Association of University Professors and Lecturers' (DHV) Position Paper on Scientific Self-regulation and Scientific Misconduct +
- Honesty in all scientific endeavors
- Supervision and guidance of students
- Dealing with misconduct +
- Awareness of legal basis
- Ethical principles of authorship +
The document offers a rationale and examples of each of the five principles. +
