Approved revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics
- Open Science Manifesto (2019), OSCDnet
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- PRINTEGER
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth
- European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2023) , ALLEA (European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities)
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy
- Peer review card exchange game
- Vulnerable Populations
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education
- The Case of Falsified Data
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines
- Trust in science , the perspective of European policy makers- Policy Brief
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
- Power to the People
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- THE SAN CODE OF RESEARCH ETHICS (2017)
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article
- Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing
- Enhancing Understanding of Science Through Science Clubs (policy brief)
- In the matter of J Hendrik Schön
- Banked Samples and HD Testing
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH)
- FOSTER project workshop
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds
- International Code of Ethics Young Scientists
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas
- The Three Rs of Animal Research
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study
- What to communicate in retraction notices?
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice
- Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members
- Anonymity Revisited
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal
- Independent Research Fund Denmark – Open Access Policy and Dissemination Guidelines
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values
- Code of Ethics Young Scientists (2018)
