Orphaned pages

From The Embassy of Good Science

The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.

50 s ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Open Science – Policy and Guidance (Research Council of Norway)
  2. Linking Data Sets
  3. Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum on Open Access (2022), Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
  4. Declaración de la Alhambra sobre acceso abierto (2010), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) and Consortium of Southern European Libraries
  5. Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice
  6. Publication and data ownership
  7. Respondent Confidentiality
  8. HEADT Centre: An Introduction to Research Integrity
  9. The Trust Code Supplement - A Global Code of Conduct for Research in Fragile Settings
  10. On Goffman: Ethnography and the Ethics of Care
  11. Fabrication and falsification
  12. The Nutty Professor
  13. Ethics unwrapped collection
  14. Data Sharing in Ongoing Projects
  15. Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy?
  16. It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud
  17. Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach
  18. Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Position Paper on Research Integrity & Research Ethics
  19. CAS Issues Open Access Policy (2014), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  20. Gluten-free turkeys? Paper on dangers of wheat-based diet in birds retracted
  21. FDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View
  22. A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research
  23. Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed
  24. WHO Policy on Open Access
  25. Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Instant Paper
  26. Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (2009), Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique, the Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten and the Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van België
  27. Giving Proper Credit
  28. Alliance of German Science Organisations' Principles for the Handling of Research Data
  29. Política de acceso abierto a la información científica y a atos de investigación financiados con fondos públicos de la ANID (2022), Chilean National Agency for Research and Development
  30. Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature
  31. https://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/connections/best-practices-collaborating-research
  32. Quality Enhancement Handbook for Icelandic Higher Education
  33. Guidelines for research institutions on managing competition and publication pressure
  34. Government Sanctions Harvard Psychologist
  35. Health Care Scheduling and Access: A Report From the IOM
  36. Freedom from Harassment for Scientists is Essential
  37. Austrain Best Practice Guide for Research Integrity and Ethics (2020)
  38. Growing Plagiarism Scandal in Iran
  39. A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethic
  40. Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations (2022), National Research Integrity Forum
  41. Analyzing Data From Studies Depicted on Video: An Activity for Statistics and Research Courses
  42. A Passport for Open Science. A practical Guide for PhD students (2022), Berti, Dacos, Gallezot, Geroudet, Granger, Janik, Josserand, Lutz, Okret-Manville, Perrid, & Thiboud
  43. Italian National Research Council's Research Ethics and Integrity Documents
  44. Open access policy for IDRC-funded project results (2015), International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
  45. The Mallorca Declaration (2016), Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE)
  46. The German Council of Science and Humanities ' Recommendations on Academic Integrity
  47. ORI comes down (hard) on Bengu Sezen, Columbia chemist accused of fraud
  48. Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data
  49. Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
  50. Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.9.0