Orphaned pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.
50 s ordered by recently added
- Policy Brief on excellent science communication for urgent societal challenges
- 负责任研究行为规范指引 - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research (2023), Department of Supervision, Ministry of Science and Technology (70. Chat GPT - China - Code of Conduct for Responsible Research, Pos. 3)
- Handbook for Supporting Training Activities on the data protection Reform
- Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations
- Societal Trust In Science, Research and Innovation (RFOs)-Policy Brief
- List of online available training options for members of research integrity offices (RIOs)
- Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research
- Randomized consent designs in randomized controlled trials: systematic literature search
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- TRREE on-line training programme on the ethics and regulation of health research involving human participants
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers
- Technician Error Leads to Harm of Animal Subjects
- Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists
- MOOC Research Ethics: a guide for responsible research with human subjects
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Review Article
- The Case of the Damaged Baby
- French plant biologist cleared of misconduct in new inquiry
- NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Responding to Allegations/Complaints of Research Misconduct
- "Hot" Gifts
- IFLA Statement on Open Access to Scholarly Literature and Research Documentation (2003), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)
- Continuing Research and Protecting Confidentiality
- Environmental journal pulls two papers for “compromised” peer review
- BT Cotton Hoax in a University in India
- The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive
- Wellcome – Open Access Policy and Guidance (2025)
- The Limits of Expertise
- Data Sharing
- Rainy Days for a Struggling Mentee
- Using data not created for research purposes in the context of collaboration with private companies
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science-Society Facilitators
- Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name
- The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
- FAPESP's Open Access Policy (2019), São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
- Legal Requests/Requirements for Confidential Data From Research Field Notes
- Is the famous emeritus professor self-plagiarising?
- UKRIO Code of Practice for Research (2023), UK Research Integrity Office
- Columbia grad student faked data in study of socioeconomics and life experiences, says retraction notice
- Supporting Health Data Cooperatives in Europe (Policy brief)
- Training and Resources in Research Ethics Evaluation (TRREE) e-learning
- Ten short cases on publication ethics
- Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2017)
- ETHICAL CODE OF THE COMMITTEE FOR ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION (2015), Committee for Ethics in Science and Higher Education
- Authorship Deserved, Not Earned: Research Ethics and Research Integrity Scenario
- Deuxième Plan National pour la science ouverte (2021), Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: Another Magazine Surprise
- Recognizing scientific artifacts in biomedical literature
- Eforcement Agencies and the Protection of Human Subjects
- Possible omission of information essential for conclusions in a research paper
- Authorship in a Multi-Center Clinical Trial: the HF-ACTION Experience
- Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (2005), Participants of the International Seminar on Open Access
