Pages with the fewest revisions
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 ionss ordered by recently added
- Research Reproducibility (2 revisions)
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi (2 revisions)
- Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review (2 revisions)
- M-Power Workshop Facilitator Instructions (2 revisions)
- Responsible Research: Recommendations of the Institute of Science and Technology, Austria (2 revisions)
- Guide to Recommendations for Responsible Practices -2013 (2013), Brazilian Academy of Sciences (2 revisions)
- Self help in medical ethics (2 revisions)
- Strategies for making research more accessible to dental students (2 revisions)
- Best Practice Guide for Research Integrity and Ethics (2020), Research Integrity / Research Ethics Working Group of BMBWF (2 revisions)
- The PREPARED Seesaw: a Digital Public Engagement Initiative (2 revisions)
- Declaración de la Alhambra sobre acceso abierto (2010), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) and Consortium of Southern European Libraries (2 revisions)
- Teaching and Learning the Techniques of Conflict Resolution for Challenging Ethics Consultations (2 revisions)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Matter. Guidelines on How To Successfully Design and Implement, Mission-Oriented Research Programmes (2 revisions)
- The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose (2 revisions)
- Lab Management instructions (2 revisions)
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study (2 revisions)
- Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (2005), Participants of the International Seminar on Open Access (2 revisions)
- Long distance collaboration (2 revisions)
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit (2 revisions)
- Ley 26.899, Repositorios digitales institucionales de acceso abierto. (2013), Argentine National Congress (2 revisions)
- Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2 revisions)
- Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation (2 revisions)
- Case Study: Beginning a Collaboration (2 revisions)
- Trainings (2 revisions)
- Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (2009), Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux Arts de Belgique, the Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique, the Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten and the Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van België (2 revisions)
- The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice (2 revisions)
- Would You Do a Post Doc with this Guy? (2 revisions)
- The Mallorca Declaration (2016), Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE) (2 revisions)
- When is Advanced Training Necessary? (2 revisions)
- Five vignettes in speech and language research (2 revisions)
- FDA Inspections Revealing Research Misconduct Hidden from Public View (2 revisions)
- Research Ethics – Official GRAD 5104 Blog - Blogs@VT (2 revisions)
- TIER2 (2 revisions)
- The German University Association's Recommendations on Academic Publication Behaviour (2 revisions)
- Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement (2 revisions)
- Tongan children’s involvement in research (2 revisions)
- People Studying People: Research Ethics in Society (2 revisions)
- Responsible authorship quick guide (2 revisions)
- The ethical dilemmas of genome editing (2 revisions)
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship (2 revisions)
- FRQ Open Access Dissemination Policy (2022), Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ) (2 revisions)
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales (2 revisions)
- Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications (2 revisions)
- Researchers Pressured to Store Animal Subjects (2 revisions)
- Data sharing and dual-use issues (2 revisions)
- Freedom from Harassment for Scientists is Essential (2 revisions)
- The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland (2023), Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK (3 revisions)
- Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic (3 revisions)
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct (3 revisions)
- Eigenfactorizer (3 revisions)
