Oldest pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 ss ordered by recently added
- Values and norms (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- The Dilemma Game (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- Cognitive dissonance and moral distress (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- Whistleblower protection/rights (17:50, 2 June 2026)
- What is the evidence for reproducibility in different epistemic contexts? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- What is reproducibility? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Data anonymity (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- New claim to authorship of published paper (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Open Access in Germany (2013), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- DOAB (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Declaration Open Science Macedonia (2021), National Open Science Cloud Initiative (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- What happens when an ex-physicist writes about gender identity? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- UKRI Open Access Policy and Guide (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Reflection on Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Multiple Submissions (2) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2010), WCRI (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- The future of scientific justice: the case of The Sceptical Environmentalist (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Transpose (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Honest refereeing (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Prominent Video Game-Violence Researcher Loses Another Paper to Retraction (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Institutional Publishing Service Providers Guidelines (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Copyright Violation (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Potential figure manipulation with corresponding author uncontactable (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Nutrition researcher selling supplements (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Evaluating Journals Using Journal Metrics: Find Journal Rankings (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Data manipulation and institute’s internal review (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Rights to Authorship (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- National Policy on Open Access (2015), Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- National OA policy of Ethiopia (2019), FDRE Ministry of Science and Higher Education (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Guidance for Fair and Fast Desk Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts During Times of Crisis (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- Good Research Practice (Swedish Research Council) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism" (17:52, 2 June 2026)
- 国家自然科学基金委员会 基础研究知识库开放获取政策实施细则 (2014), National Natural Science Foundation Committee (NSFC) (17:52, 2 June 2026)
