Orphaned pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages are not linked from or transcluded into other pages in The Embassy of Good Science.
50 s ordered by recently added
- Being grossly unfair to your collaborators
- Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports
- AI use in scientific writing
- Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection
- Consent for publication (Participant)
- Falsifiability and Attractor States in Scientific Theories: A Framework for Evaluating Evidence
- Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity
- Anonymisation and pseudonymisation
- Secondary corrections
- Questionable Research Practices in Study Design
- Internet Research Ethics
- Methods to increase data availability
- Empathy in History Research and Education
- Hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing)
- Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC)
- High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science (HIRMEOS)
- Replicability in the Humanities
- Gene Editing: Ethical Frontiers and Scientific Integrity
- Responsible use of AI in peer review
- Industry-funded continuing medical education – ethical conundrums
- The ethical dilemmas of genome editing
- Research collaboration
- Prioritising interventions and reproducibility measures to improve research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation method
- Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
- The Ghost Collaborator
- ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
- Who Owns the Field Notes
- Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
- Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
- Data anonymity
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
- Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
- New claim to authorship of published paper
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
- Open Access Policy (2017) — Austrian Science Fund
- Open Access in Germany (2013), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/ Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
- A Case Series in Publication Ethics: Editorial Misconduct
- Leibniz Institute's Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice
- Science Ethics Code of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (2010), Hungarian Academy of Sciences
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Promoting responsible conduct in research through "survival skills" workshops: some mentoring is best done in a crowd
- VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Funders
- National Research Integrity Framework of Tanzania (2020)
- Inconsistent Findings Between Trainee and Researcher
- Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct
- UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.
- The Wild West of Animal Experimentation
- Criminologist to have four papers retracted following months of scrutiny
- DOAB
