Pages without language links
From The Embassy of Good Science
The following pages do not link to other language versions.
50 rwikis ordered by recently added
- ORI - The Office of Research Integrity
- Serious gaming in research integrity education
- Non-reporting of negative findings
- Dilemmas in daily practice
- Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
- Unfair reviewing
- Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes
- Consent for publication (Author)
- Research misconduct
- Peer review
- SCImago Journal Rankings
- Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspective
- Ethical issues in qualitative research
- Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials
- Cross-boundary collaborations
- Honorary or gift authorship
- Not asking permission from contributors for the wording of the acknowledgement
- Preregistration of animal study protocols
- Research Integrity lunch meetings
- Statistical pre-registration
- Research integrity training for PhD students
- Non-disclosure of changes to the research design
- Incidental research findings
- Respectable and honest supervision ensures responsible and ethical research in the future.
- Consent and assent in research on children
- Peer review card game
- Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies
- Teaching sensitive and controversial issues in divided societies
- Ignoring substantial safety risks of studies
- Polarized research
- Conducting research in high risk locations
- Imposter Syndrome
- Ethical considerations in dealing with human remains
- The ethics of managing a laboratory or research group
- Posing irrelevant research questions
- Anonymous Authorship
- Publication
- Gender bias
- Forensic Statistics to detect Data Fabrication
- Importance of healthy lifestyle
- Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting
- Predatory publishing
- How to be a good lab partner
- Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
- Qualitative research
- Virtues in research integrity
- Privacy in research
- Inappropriate authorship
- Grading the quality of evidence in clinical practice guidelines
- Research Integrity champions
