LoginSign up

Approved revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

View list of: Pages whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved pages | All pages with an approved revision | Pages with invalid approvals | Files whose approved revision is not their latest | Unapproved files | All files with an approved revision | Files with invalid approvals

50 ss ordered by recently added

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. Research with humans
  2. Replicability in the Humanities
  3. Gene Editing: Ethical Frontiers and Scientific Integrity
  4. Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
  5. Research with animals
  6. Intellectual conflicts of interest
  7. Industry funded research
  8. The ethical dilemmas of genome editing
  9. Research collaboration
  10. Publication bias (positive results)
  11. Inappropriate study design
  12. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
  13. Balancing harms and benefits
  14. Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
  15. Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA)
  16. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
  17. Self-plagiarism
  18. Perverse incentives
  19. Informed assent
  20. Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility
  21. Fake peer-reviewing
  22. Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI
  23. Whistleblower protection/rights
  24. The ConScience App - theatre play
  25. Online Module: Responsible research and Peer Review
  26. Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
  27. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature
  28. Canadian Tri-agency framework: Responsible Conduct of Research
  29. Romanian Scientists Fight Plagiarism
  30. Journal peer review
  31. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Principles of Conduct for Archaeologists involved in Contract Archaeological Work
  32. Science as an open enterprise (2012), The Royal Society Science Policy Centre
  33. Code of Ethics of the Croatian Committee on Ethics in Science and Higher Education
  34. The Ghost Collaborator
  35. ‘Caught in the act’: Veterinary researcher caught fabricating gene data, resigns from university job
  36. Data sharing and dual-use issues
  37. Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
  38. Who Owns the Field Notes
  39. The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland's Guidelines on Good Research Practice
  40. Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (2018)
  41. POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science
  42. Animal research: IACUC Inspection Virtual Walkthrough
  43. Data anonymity
  44. Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
  45. Want to make sure your paper gets published? Just do your own peer review like this researcher did
  46. New claim to authorship of published paper
  47. Retraction notice - fake email peer-review
  48. Chinese 'Opinions' on Strengthening Research Integrity
  49. Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement
  50. Center for Open and REproducible Science (CORES)
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:ApprovedRevs"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Bluesky Logo.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.3.4