05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity

Instructions

05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity

Instructions for:TraineeTrainer

Duration (hours)

2

For whom is this important?

ResearchersEthics committee membersResearch Ethics CommitteesResearch Integrity OfficersAdministrators

Method

Participatory sessions

Steps

1Identify and Clarify the Issue

2Early View (‘What do I think?’)

3What are My Reasons for Thinking This?

4Communicate My Early View

5Listen to and Recognise the Early Views and Associated Reasons of All Other Members of the Committee

6Review My Early View

7Develop an Informed Judgment

8Reach a Consensus with Other Members of the Committee

1

Identify and Clarify the Issue

2

Early View (‘What do I think?’)

3

What are My Reasons for Thinking This?

4

Communicate My Early View

5

Listen to and Recognise the Early Views and Associated Reasons of All Other Members of the Committee

6

Review My Early View

7

Develop an Informed Judgment

8

Reach a Consensus with Other Members of the Committee

Steps

Other information

Virtues & Values

• Fairness
• Respect
• Responsibility
• Accountability
• Transparency

Good Practices & Misconduct

• Academic Responsibility of University
• Allegations of misconduct
• Communication
• Complaints procedure
• Ethical Dilemma
• Good Practice
• Institutional Responsibilities
• Investigation
• Misconduct Investigations
• Research Misconduct Investigation