Difference between revisions of "Resource:05f04469-5834-4411-9217-c2551a0c745a"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Guidelines
 
|Resource Type=Guidelines
 
|Title=Declaration of Helsinki
 
|Title=Declaration of Helsinki
|Is About=Every research project that involves humans should balance harms and benefits.
+
|Is About=Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Developed by the World Medical Association in 1964, the Declaration of Helsinki is a fundamental document on biomedical research that works as a code of research ethics and provides principles to protect human subjects in biomedical research.
|Important Because=When considering any research project, the potential net benefit should outweigh the potential net harm. This is in line with the universally recognized ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (not doing harm). These two principles stem from the belief that human beings have inherent dignity, which was formalized in the UN Declaration of Human Rights <ref>UN General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Accessed 28 May 2019. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/</ref>. In biomedical research, harms will almost inevitably be experienced alongside benefits. That’s why it’s important to carefully assess how important the benefits are and under what cost. These dilemmas should always be communicated to research participants, to ensure fully informed consent.
+
|Important Because=The Declaration of Helsinki is especially important to protect the well-being of human subjects involved in biomedical research. It serves as a call of duty for physicians, that need to safeguard the welfare of the human subjects. Different European societies, such as the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, the Biomedical Alliance in Europe, and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association, have endorsed the declaration in their code of ethics and conduct.
 
 
A number of mid-20th century studies, such as the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, were conducted to examine the natural history of a disease by either deliberately exposing human subjects to damaging stimuli, or by not giving them effective treatment <ref>Alsan M, Wanamaker M. Tuskegee and the health of black men. Q J Econ. 2018;133(1):407–455</ref>. These are some of the most prominent examples of disproportionate harm to benefit.
 
<references />
 
 
|Important For=PhD Students; Research subjects; Scientists; Ethics committee members; Principal investigators
 
|Important For=PhD Students; Research subjects; Scientists; Ethics committee members; Principal investigators
|Has Best Practice=The Belmont report <ref>National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Accessed 28 May 2019. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html</ref>, the Declaration of Helsinki <ref>World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194</ref> and similar ethical and legal documents were enacted by governing bodies and professional associations.
+
|Has Best Practice=<br />
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
}}
 
}}
Line 14: Line 11:
 
|Has Link=https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
 
|Has Link=https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Resource=Resource:E9cd7ee1-bd54-4d5c-bdd9-786ef1c9f603
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:E5629f68-81f6-490d-84d6-fd1e63b8dbc7;Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 +
|Involves=WMA; European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons; Biomedical Alliance in Europe (Biomed Alliance); European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
 
|Has Timepoint=1964 - 2013
 
|Has Timepoint=1964 - 2013
 
|Has Location=Finland
 
|Has Location=Finland
 +
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability
 +
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Balancing harms and benefits; Research with Humans
 +
|Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences; LS 07.08 - Health services, health care research
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:01, 27 July 2021

Guidelines

Declaration of Helsinki

What is this about?

Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Developed by the World Medical Association in 1964, the Declaration of Helsinki is a fundamental document on biomedical research that works as a code of research ethics and provides principles to protect human subjects in biomedical research.

Why is this important?

The Declaration of Helsinki is especially important to protect the well-being of human subjects involved in biomedical research. It serves as a call of duty for physicians, that need to safeguard the welfare of the human subjects. Different European societies, such as the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, the Biomedical Alliance in Europe, and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association, have endorsed the declaration in their code of ethics and conduct.

For whom is this important?

What are the best practices?


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6