Difference between revisions of "Resource:3cadb4be-b312-4afa-a723-4e12c4a801f3"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
 
|Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
|Is About=This case is about a university in Australia, the University of Queensland, where several papers have been retracted after discorvering data were missing. This was not the first time the university had been in the news this way. This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case about the University of Queensland, Australia, where a paper has been retracted after the authors discovered that data was missing, and alleged “undeclared conflicts of interest” in at least three other papers were investigated.
|Important Because=It is important to stay critical, even when the university had been investigated before concerning other cases.
+
|Important Because=This was not the first time the university had been in the news regarding allegations of research misconduct, and demonstrates the importance of remaining critical and maintaining transparency and accountability in order to handle actual and alleged research misconduct. More specifically, this case highlights the importance of good data management and code version control, as well as clarity and transparency with regards to affiliations and potential conflicts of interest.
|Important For=Researchers
+
|Important For=Researchers; Universities
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
Line 10: Line 10:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0
+
|Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0;Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Christoph Schnelle; Others at University of Queensland; Retraction Watch
+
|Involves=Christoph Schnelle; Retraction Watch; University of Queensland
 
|Has Timepoint=19-4-2018
 
|Has Timepoint=19-4-2018
 
|Has Location=Australia
 
|Has Location=Australia
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty
+
|Has Virtue And Value=Transparency; Reproducibility; Accountability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; Australia Retractions
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; Data management; Retraction
 +
|Related To Research Area=LS 07 - Diagnostic Tools, Therapies and Public Health; LS 05 - Neurosciences and Neural Disorders
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 17:32, 31 July 2020

Cases

Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News

What is this about?

This is a factual case about the University of Queensland, Australia, where a paper has been retracted after the authors discovered that data was missing, and alleged “undeclared conflicts of interest” in at least three other papers were investigated.

Why is this important?

This was not the first time the university had been in the news regarding allegations of research misconduct, and demonstrates the importance of remaining critical and maintaining transparency and accountability in order to handle actual and alleged research misconduct. More specifically, this case highlights the importance of good data management and code version control, as well as clarity and transparency with regards to affiliations and potential conflicts of interest.

For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6