Difference between revisions of "Resource:3cadb4be-b312-4afa-a723-4e12c4a801f3"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
 
|Title=Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
|Is About=This is a factual case about the University of Queensland, Australia, where a paper has been retracted after the authors discovered that data was missing, and alleged “undeclared conflicts of interest” in at least three other papers were investigated.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
|Important Because=This was not the first time the university had been in the news regarding allegations of research misconduct, and demonstrates the importance of remaining critical and maintaining transparency and accountability in order to handle actual and alleged research misconduct. More specifically, this case highlights the importance of good data management and code version control, as well as clarity and transparency with regards to affiliations and potential conflicts of interest.
 
 
|Important For=Researchers; Universities
 
|Important For=Researchers; Universities
 
}}
 
}}
Line 13: Line 12:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Christoph Schnelle; Retraction Watch; University of Queensland
+
|Involves=Retraction Watch
 
|Has Timepoint=19-4-2018
 
|Has Timepoint=19-4-2018
 
|Has Location=Australia
 
|Has Location=Australia

Revision as of 16:41, 19 October 2020

Cases

Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6