Difference between revisions of "Resource:43c4d969-6b45-47f1-b96b-a0da8fe7ef29"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Title=Anonymity Revisited
 
|Title=Anonymity Revisited
 
|Is About=This fictional case is about an applied medical anthropologist who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.
 
|Is About=This fictional case is about an applied medical anthropologist who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.
|Important Because=Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there was any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.
+
|Important Because=Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there is any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.
|Important For=Researchers
+
|Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; Research subjects; research integrity researchers
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
Line 10: Line 10:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f
+
|Related To Resource=Resource:887faa17-01f0-43b4-acde-a610054581c4;Resource:F7ed25ad-cfab-4040-b52f-596accc3c317;Resource:5fb837af-4817-4081-b7c5-4013c254f689;Resource:232ffbe0-b7fb-4d04-b605-493e10bc04c6;Resource:9c917ab2-c01d-446b-89c1-a9cd415afb00
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f;Theme:A1a1b736-7002-405c-8375-711a11f20e04;Theme:0d054575-ca21-4209-b7c5-6120fc0ed647;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9;Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd
 +
|Related To Instruction=Instruction:4e235a59-4819-40a1-b9d2-598565a69a49
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 +
|Involves=Mary Jones
 +
|Has Timepoint=1969-1972
 
|Has Location=USA; United States
 
|Has Location=USA; United States
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Honesty
+
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Honesty; Responsibility
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Privacy; Anonymity; Recognition
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Privacy; Anonymity; Recognition
 
|Related To Research Area=Other humanities
 
|Related To Research Area=Other humanities
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:17, 30 July 2020

Cases

Anonymity Revisited

What is this about?

This fictional case is about an applied medical anthropologist who wrote a series of articles when she was working in an urban black community in the United States. She wrote her articles in an anonymous way so that individuals and/or the community would not be harmed. However, members of the community started a discussion because they were surprised that the name of the community health center and the name of the town were not given.

Why is this important?

Anthropological conventions specify the use of pseudonyms in certain types of anthropological reporting, specifically if there is any chance that individuals or a community might be harmed.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6