Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:D303f2ff-021f-4b2e-a145-f7b441e35830;Resource:Acc068ac-a0c0-48fa-b6a2-ff7448bf2573;Resource:8354ff67-9da4-4325-8395-d16e30059fb2;Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb | ||
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:03, 7 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
