Difference between revisions of "Resource:75d1fe41-31cd-4ac5-b70d-5fdde322989c"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=WHO formally retracts opioid guidelines that came under fire
+
|Title=WHO Formally Retracts Opioid Guidelines that Came under Fire
|Is About=This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics  in 2011 and 2012.  
+
|Is About=This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics  in 2011 and 2012. This is a factual case.
 
 
 
 
This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=It is important to stay critical in all cases.
 
 
 
 
 
Website Blog (Retractionwatch)
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 15: Line 8:
 
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2020/01/08/who-formally-retracts-opioid-guidelines-that-came-under-fire/
 
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2020/01/08/who-formally-retracts-opioid-guidelines-that-came-under-fire/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 +
|Involves=Retraction Watch
 
|Has Timepoint=10-1-2020
 
|Has Timepoint=10-1-2020
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability

Revision as of 22:15, 26 May 2020

Cases

WHO Formally Retracts Opioid Guidelines that Came under Fire

What is this about?

This case is about the World Health Organization (WHO), who retracted its controversial guidelines on the use of opoid analgetics in 2011 and 2012. This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6