Difference between revisions of "Resource:81d54c73-e442-47d8-923c-7576d7bdd60e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | |Title=The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal | ||
| − | |Is About=This case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author | + | |Is About=This factual case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author. |
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | + | |Has Timepoint=1-6-2015; 2015 | |
| − | |Has Timepoint=1-6-2015 | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
Revision as of 10:59, 15 October 2020
ResourcesCases
The Problem With Michael LaCour’s Rebuttal
What is this about?
This factual case is about a political science PhD student, who was accused of scientific fraud. He did not agree with the retraction of his paper which was requested by his co-author.
