Difference between revisions of "Resource:Adad1721-62c8-46fd-83f9-617770437d90"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism
+
|Title=Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism
|Is About=This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions<ref>http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/</ref>. This is a factual case.  
+
|Is About=This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions<ref>Palus, Shannon. "Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism." ''Retraction Watch'' (2016).</ref>. This is a factual case.  
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers

Revision as of 20:23, 26 May 2020

Cases

Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism

What is this about?

This case is about a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions[1]. This is a factual case.

  1. Palus, Shannon. "Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism." Retraction Watch (2016).

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6