Difference between revisions of "Resource:E1f32efa-98f0-4036-857b-441c15bb39da"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Doctors Experimenting on Humans: Five Questions with Dr. Nalini Rajamannan
+
|Title=Doctors Experimenting on Humans
 
|Is About=This case is an ethical issue about experimenting on humans without their approval. In particular this case is about a Dr X who experimented a heart valve device on his patients. Dr Y found out this unethical case and said something about it to the university. This is a factual case.
 
|Is About=This case is an ethical issue about experimenting on humans without their approval. In particular this case is about a Dr X who experimented a heart valve device on his patients. Dr Y found out this unethical case and said something about it to the university. This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=Ethical cases are not easy and must be investigated well.
 
|Important Because=Ethical cases are not easy and must be investigated well.

Revision as of 15:01, 26 May 2020

Cases

Doctors Experimenting on Humans

What is this about?

This case is an ethical issue about experimenting on humans without their approval. In particular this case is about a Dr X who experimented a heart valve device on his patients. Dr Y found out this unethical case and said something about it to the university. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

Ethical cases are not easy and must be investigated well.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6